Hidenet Publications Try us for FREE View Sample Reports Subscribe Now!
Hidenet Publications  
Member Login  

Username:

Password:

 


 Save my sign in information in a cookie
Forgot password


 Publisher's Blog 

Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     0 Comments Thursday, April 29, 2010
Title: Arizona's new mmigration law


I think it’s a good law

I also think it’s a bad law

As soon as it was announced that Arizona’s governor had signed a new immigration law, two of my most liberal friends fired off emails to me saying how horrible it is.

Racial profiling was the immediate reaction. Stopping people on the street to check their papers, smacked of Nazism to many.

Some of the media are now talking how a number of organizations are changing their plans to hold meetings in Arizona because of this terrible law.

The law gives local police broad authority to stop and request documents from anyone they reasonably suspect is an illegal immigrant. It calls for aggressive prosecution of illegal immigrants, and officers can be sued if they do not enforce the law.

One of our state senators, John McCain says it’s a very good law as Arizona is being overwhelmed with Mexican drugs along with hoards of illegal immigrants slipping through the states, beef up, but still porous border protection efforts.

I have heard estimates that about 10% of the population are illegal, most of who are Hispanic/Mexican.
As always, there are a number of pro’s and con’s to everything.

Police in Arizona are not about to take the time they don’t have to stop people on the street, namely Hispanics and almost always Mexicans to ask for proof of citizenship such as a driver’s license (that’s another story!)

As is the case everyplace else, they have their hands full in this time of budget cuts, just trying to protect the public from crime that goes on day in and day out.

Illegal immigrants take advantage of many services that costs the state money. Money that could be saved to go towards reducing the deficit.

It just so happens that a sizable percentage of this crime is committed by illegal immigrants and in the past, police could only turn the illegal’s they captured over to the immigration and naturalization service that could not cope with more people to process and often let them go.

What nobody talks about however is the value of the illegal immigrants to our society.

To look at it pragmatically, illegal immigrants work cheaper than anyone else, and typically work are hard works. Many eventually become legal by various means and are proud of it.

If all of these illegals are sent home, and that’s a practical impossibility, who would replace the work they do for the wages they accept?
Nobody, which would mean that wages for the kind of labor, they perform day in and day out would rise considerably as would the cost of living in the areas that they left.

Additionally, the billions and billions of dollars they send back to their families every monthly/year would vanish. This would severely impact millions of the poorest families in Mexico and put more strain on their already troubled economy and political situation (drugs specifically)

At one point during the Bush administration, a plan was proffered calling for amnesty for illegal’s if they would register and have a crime free record after five years. They would then be required to pass a citizenship test, like all other legal immigrants, and follow the tens of millions before them into becoming Americans.

This idea or something similar makes good sense to me, but alas, it has not come to pass.

At this stage, the law will be tested and challenged in Arizona and elsewhere as to whether it’s legal or not to racially profile someone, and who knows what the final outcome will be.

I might add that Israelis use racial profiling in the airports and other public places and have had remarkably good results. I believe it’s even being tried in some airports here now as well.

If you’re in law enforcement, you know the type of person who typically commits a crime. If you’re a salesman, you instinctively know from experience if the person in front of you is going to buy or not. It comes with the territory

Therefore, whatever other aspects of the law are good or bad, Arizona does have a growing and seemingly insurmountable problem of a flood of illegal’s and drugs seeping across our long and penetrable border with Mexico.

Law enforcement authorities are not about to spend their time checking people who look Hispanic no more than they are going to raid every business that they suspect are hiring illegals. Under this law they can, but they don’t have the wherewithal to do so.

By the by, did anyone complain when federal authorities obtained the right, and did raid factories that they knew hired illegal’s years ago?

Did anyone threaten to sue when the federal government made it mandatory for employers to certify applicants for jobs had the proper documentation to prove their legal status or face severe fines?

This Federal law has been in effect now for years and by hook or crook, employers are finding enough low priced immigrant labor and somehow comply with the federal law requiring proof of citizenship. The same thing is more than likely to evolve in Arizona as well.

The wonderful Mexican landscaper who comes weekly to take care of our yard with a crew of 3 or 4 non-English speakers hasn’t been seen since the law passed.

P.S.  An outspoken friend of mine sent me this email the other day:
 
"Being a long time resident of Arizona I find it amazing that the Governor signed a law that reflects the Federal law already in effect. For those morons who want to boycott Arizona, why not ask your state government which is the ONLY state to vote on and pass the MLK Holiday. Oh my it's that racist state Arizona.
 
If you don't want to visit our beautiful state, so be it. If you do and you do not do anything unlawful I don't think you will ever be stopped because of the color of your skin. I left Tombstone Arizona yesterday and lo and behold I had to stop at a Border Patrol station, and I'm as white as you can get (actually mostly grey by now).
 
So give us a break. Maybe more states will wake up and pass a like lawful law and stop the illegal aliens problem once and for all."
 
 
 
 
 
Comment on this entry


Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     0 Comments Friday, April 23, 2010
Title: How long to stay?


I would presume that most if not all readers have been in both business and social situations and wondered when would be the best time to leave.

By this I mean if you’re out for a meal with another person or couple, when is it appropriate to say it’s time to go?

When is it right to use body language or put into the conversation that it’s time to end the evening, or lunch or whatever?

Did you ever notice that in a group social situation when someone starts to leave, everyone follows?
Were they waiting for an excuse to leave? Did they not want to be at the event without those that were leaving? Was it an excuse for a grateful exit?

Haven’t you ever hear the host saying; “I never thought they’d leave?”

Most people use polite excuses when they’re ready to go. This includes looking at your watch and saying “gee, I didn’t realize it was getting so late”, or, Oh, I have an appointment” or a plane or train to catch”, or “I better go now and beat the traffic” and on and on.

How about at a cocktail party or an industry related social event?

You’re in a room full of people, many of whom you wish to talk to, but you’re stuck in a corner with one person. How to extract yourself and not let the person you’re talking to know that you’d rather be elsewhere?

The most challenging is when you are at someone’s house and there’s no set meal to finish or event to conclude.

Last night we were invited over to a friend’s house for cocktails, or a drink and snacks. They are very nice people and this is the first time we have done anything socially.

They had an array of cheeses and cold cuts etc and served some terrific wine (x Cosco- Cameron Hughes lot 137 Syrah Paso Robles). It was perfect with what we ate and we enjoyed ourselves.

The conversation flowed smoothly but at some point, I wondered when it would be appropriate to leave.
My wife and I certainly did not want to over-stay our welcome, and I was not wearing a watch so I couldn’t tell how long we’d been there.

I didn’t have a clue either as to how long they expected us to stay? 30 minutes? 1 hr? 3 hrs? How do you know?

I tried to observe their body language or read them somehow, but I could not. I couldn’t communicate with my wife either.  Haven’t you ever been to a party or a dinner and you had to send signals to your companion that you wanted to leave?

No chance to do that here, so what to do?

Again, no clue as to how long we’d been there, but I had eaten my full, my wife did not seem as enthusiastically conversational as she had been at first, nor did they, so I figured it was time to make our move.

We got up, gave our sincere thanks, they didn’t protest (guess we were there long enough as far as they were concerned) and off we went.

Did we leave to soon? Stay to long? Were they pleased with the length of our visit? We’ll never know.
Some call it couples dating. They did say that we should get together for dinner sometime, so I guess we were somewhat of a hit!

Don’t you always wonder what they say about you after you leave? We’ll never know….
 
 
Comment on this entry


Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     0 Comments Sunday, April 18, 2010
Title: Face to Face - A guest blog by Richard Smith

A colleague of sorts in the leather trade recently wrote an article after attending the Hong Kong Leather Fair. It is a message similar to a previous blog I wrote about the importance of "pressing the flesh" or personal meetings to furhter business, or for that matter, any relation ship.

LEATHER

Face-to-Face

by FNA posted on 12 Apr 2010 
RICHARD SMITH

Traveling back from Hong Kong after an immensely successful and satisfying APLF I picked up the latest edition of Business Week. What caught my attention was the front cover illustrating the Chinese flag behind a chain link fence emblazoned with the headline “The New Protectionism”.

The lead article was an interesting read despite the blatantly anti-Chinese angle which discredited the article itself. Nevertheless, what caught my eye was a full page advertisement for British Airways with the headline: “Experience what we know. Business is done better face-to-face”.


Face-to-Face negotiations at APLF 2010

With the advent of electronic conferencing, email, instant chat and free-of-charge Skype this claim could be debatable in today’s world. But apparently not so in terms of the fashion industry. According to International Herald Tribune fashion writer, Suzy Menkes, this world is now permeated by a combination of materials and leather almost reminiscent of the Swinging Sixties in London.

The question is how can you appreciate the tone, texture, smell and “je ne sais quoi” of leather when a potential designer and/or supplier sends you a .jpg file to your email or Skype account, hoping you will order 500 units?

Besides being a “people business” the leather industry is not really an industry where electronic sales will eventually dominate. Sure, there are all sorts of statistics floating around proving that the Y generation will purchase footwear via the internet. But what serious buyer in his right mind will buy 500 bags designed by Jean Paul Gaultier from a.jpg image or .pdf design sketch? Please name one!

Leather demands more than bytes. It demands “see me, feel me, touch me, and smell me”. There can be no other option. Only people with a lack of knowledge would consider buying leather mainly on price rather than on the quality. Leather has to be “experienced” and even more so with a whole palette of colors available which would lose their impact in a .gif or .jpg file.

British Airways needs seats filled on their jets. “Last year we took over 600 professionals to London and beyond – for free – so that they could conduct business face-to-face”, boasts the Business Week advertisement. All very commendable and one has to agree with BA that face-to-face is more effective and more personal, especially for the 600 professionals transported free-of-charge to London.

The key elements here are “600”, “free” and “face-to-face”. Last week some 23,000 plus visitors attended the world’s leading fashion and materials/leather event. They met “face-to-face” and “free” with their suppliers at APLF in Hong Kong. This is mandatory in any event where leather is combined with fashion.

You just cannot sign a deal with any confidence unless it is face-to-face where leather or fashion is involved. You just have to see the product and APLF offers this opportunity “free” to many thousands of fashion professionals. Perhaps this should be advertised as an even bigger give-away by highlighting the “see me, feel me, touch me, and smell me” requirements of top class leather design?

In the meantime, I’d better get back to reading about “The New Protectionism” which we will cover at a later date, since that was the initial reason I purchased Business Week. But somehow, reminding ourselves about the face-to-face concept seems to be much more important both for the leather fashion industry…… as well as for British Airways….

Here’s a five minute video from British Airways Face to Face campaign with a Boeing 747 aptly named “Face to Face”.  Listen to the introduction by the BA marketing person and the comments from the participants. We could not have said it any better. If you think that video conferencing, emails or phone calls compares to this, then perhaps it might be worth reconsidering the sales strategy!
Comment on this entry


Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     1 Comments Monday, April 12, 2010
Title: Game Change - the Presidency


I’ve tried to stay from my political views on these pages, and I shall continue to do so. However, I must say that while I am opposed to nearly all of Obama’s policies and see his VP Biden as a loose cannon, I am very glad that McCain and Palin lost the last election.

I have just finished a fascinating book called Game Change. If, like me, you stay abreast of current events and read the papers, you will find this book hard to put down.

It takes the reader behind the scenes of how Presidential candidates operate in the primaries and then for the primary winners, the national election.

All of the candidates hire what they hope will be the best and brightest to run their campaign. This ranges from travel arrangements, finding and gathering crowds and locations to hear the candidates, managing the press, raising money and a multitude of details to numerous to list here.

It also details the primary fight between Hillary Clinton and Obama and the pitfalls that hurt her campaign and cost her the nomination. The book shows that had she had the right people and managed them effectively, she would more than likely have been the party’s nominee.

She didn’t do it right and Obama did. The result had nothing to do with their qualifications to become President.

I’ve always heard that Presidential candidates chose their running mates based on their ability to get votes. Reading Game Change, I can see that there is little if any thought as to how competent the Vice Presidential candidate might be if the President dies or becomes incapacitated.

They’re chosen strictly for their vote getting ability. If they have other skills, that’s a plus but is typically secondary.

The whole process is packaging, or imaging. I’m sure Proctor and Gamble uses similar criteria in selling their soap. Make the product look like what the public wants and it will sell. So will a candidate. “Tell em what they want to hear!”

It’s ludicrous that the potential leader of the free world is chosen in this way.

I always have said that any president is only as good as the people around him. Just like the top person of any organization is only as good as those around him.

The Presidential candidate who can muster and manage and raise enough money wins the primary and then the national election. This does not necessarily make him the best President by any means, but his ability to win certainly says something for his management skills, a very important facet of being President.

So why am I, a conservative, very pleased that Obama won?

Because this book, which was, in my opinion, not prejudicial for either party or candidate, showed how inept a leader of his campaign McCain was compared to Obama.

Most of all, it shows how inept it was for McCain to pick Palin at the last minute without going through the normal vetting process. This resulted in fielding a running make amazingly ignorant of the world around her as well as its history.

The book showed that she’s far from dumb and has since educated herself and we haven’t heard the last of her.

The point is, no business would hire its leaders and top managers the way we elect our politicians. No business would likely employ a majority of members of congress and in the executive branch based on the way too many of them perform.

In large part, it’s the system. From day one, not only here but also in most if not all other countries, money and influence talks.

Candidates have no chance to get enough votes to win without financing. In almost all, if not all cases of significant donors, those who contribute expect something in return, either directly or indirectly.

In my view, the only way to overcome this is what is known as public financing.

Give each candidate x dollars and prohibit funding from any other source, including the candidate himself. Will we ever see it, I doubt it.
 
 
 
 
Comment on this entry


Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     2 Comments Sunday, April 11, 2010
Title: The fragility of life

As I was leaving home yesterday morning, I saw a fire truck and an ambulence parked in front of my neighbor’s house. I stopped to inquiry. The paramedic said they were not allowed by federal law to tell me what happened, but, in so many words, he let me that there was a death in side.

I knew immediately that it was my friend. He was in his early 70’s, had diabetes for many years and was so over-weight, he couldn’t walk very far.

Although he was obviously not in good health, he was tenacious in his pursuit of things that interested him, one of which happened to be our Home Owners Association.  He had a lively personality, a sharp mind and excellent common sense. I know this because we served on several boards together and for the last two years, I had worked very closely with him and a few others on matters concerning our HOA.  We had a meeting at his house just the other night, but looking back, he didn’t quite seem himself.

Even though by looking at him, you could guess his longevity would not be long, it was still a shock to sit down for a few hours in a meeting with him, and then less tan 48 hrs later, boom, he’s gone.

My father died this way when I was in my early teens. We had dinner; he watched some television, (and if I remember right, It was I love Lucy, and did he love that show and laughed and laughed at her antics). Then he went to bed, had a heart attack, and boom he was gone.

We all know situations like this. It could be an automobile accident, or in war, when it’s almost commonplace. Boom, a living breathing soul with all of the hopes, disappointments and joys and problems we all live with each day, and their lives are over in an instant.

As I said to his widow, I truly believe that after here, we all go to a better place, but of course nobody knows for sure. I also said that we all die sooner or later, and quickly is the best. I doubt if I was any comfort as she naturally was distraught.

So what’s the lesson; To never forget that every life is fragile and at the same time precious. To never take anything for granted and to live fully in every moment that we can. Savor the time we have with those dear one’s who we don’t see very often, and even those that we do.

I always remember my grandmother crying every time she’d leave us and go back to her home 700 or so miles away. We only got to see her several times a year. As a boy, I wondered why she would cry? We always had such a good time when we were together.

Now, 60 or so years later, as I am approximately her age when she would leave and cry, I now know why. She realized the fragility of life and wondered if she’d ever see us again.

From a totally different aspect, let’s look at how we spend our cherished days on earth.
Do we scrimp and save and put off doing the things that bring us pleasure until tomorrow when “we’ll have more time” or “things will be better”, or next year we’ll do this, or next month or tomorrow?

What if we lose our job or source of income? What if we run out of money before we die?

Thirty or forty years ago, my uncle married his (my cousin.) They were a widower and a widow and had grown up together. They were in their late sixties or early seventies. They had a big wedding, half a continent away from us, and all of the family gathered. We of course were invited but I said to my wife that I didn’t want to take the time off from work, and spend the money to go.

What a mistake. Half the people there were aged and died soon after, and those who went cherished the time they had together.

From then on, my wife and I decided that we would do everything we could to make any family event and those of good friends, and we did. We never regretted it, and I often come across pictures of those good times and enjoy the fond memories. (the only downside is to see how young I once looked!)

I said to my new bride that one of the reasons that we should have a significant wedding celebration last month was to gather all of the friends and relatives we could afford, and who could come to share in the joy of our wonderful union and birthday. We were so fortunate to find love again in our lives.

Yes, we all have to have some financial preparedness for the future, and for emergencies and the unknown. But let us not forget to live, love and appreciate our life while we’re still healthy enough to do so.
Comment on this entry


Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     0 Comments Tuesday, April 06, 2010
Title: Good chain food/wine


Most people generally think there are better places to eat than at chain food restaurants, but all will agree, there are some exceptions. Cheesecake factory comes to mind.

Also as the national chains become more dominant the small operators can’t compete. This leaves fewer options for “home cooked” food.

This past week, our grandchildren were visiting, and we had the opportunity to visit some of the better one’s.

A long time favorite, and one I would highly recommend is Famous Dave’s. They’re all over the country and in my humble opinion, have the best barbeque, (aside of Wharton Texas), that I’ve ever eaten! 

The price is reasonable for what you get, the service can’t be beat and there’s a wide range of entrée’s to choose from. Don’s grade for this barbeque restaurant: A

Another national chain that I’ve only eaten once or twice in Las Vegas is the Rain Forest Café. Talk about “shtick” this one is loaded with it.

Thunder, lightening, elephants and lions roaring, etc. Kids love it. The menu is broad, the prices are relatively reasonable, and to my surprise, the food was quite good. Delicious no, but for what it was, I would recommend it, especially with small children. Don’s grade: B

Also this past month, I happened to eat at one of my local Phoenix favorites called Chelsea’s Kitchen. I like it so much I went there for my birthday to savor their short ribs of beef. The waiter recommended a wine that I’d like to pass on.

It’s called Lang & Reed Cabernet Franc. I had the 2007 at the restaurant and bought several bottles to have at home. It sells in the store, if you can find it, for about $13.00-$15.00. It’s dry, but not heavy and is flavorful. Goes well with the aforementioned beef short ribs, steak and pork tenderloin that I enjoyed tonight.

During our wedding last month, we had to have some sacramental wine for the ceremony. It’s just a few sips from a shared goblet. The Rabbi cautioned us to get a white wine as it can spill sometimes and red wine would ruin the brides dress. He also asked that we buy kosher wine.

Off I went and found a bottle for of Recanati Israeli Chardonnay. It’s a 2006 medium bodied, fresh testing semi dry to dry white wine. It cost $15.99.

It was so good, my bride and I had more than a few sips (more like gulps!) during the ceremony. I brought the rest of it into the reception to share with some friends. I have since bought a few more bottles, had it with turkey the other night and highly recommend it.

By the way, if you drink wine at home and have a partial bottle left over that you’d like to keep for a week or ten days, there is a device that comes with a rubber cork, that you put in the opened bottle. You then pump this thing over the rubber cork and it takes the air out.  It’s fast and simple and the wine keeps well in the refrigerator for a limited amount of time. Most wine stores have it.

Speaking of wine, I received an unsolicited email today from Zagat, the respected restaurant guide in North America. They were hawking 12 bottles of recommended wine for $69.99 plus another $20.00 for shipping. This comes to $7.50 a bottle, so I thought I’d try the variety of Red wine’s they offer.  A good deal?

I’ll let you know.

 

 

 

 

Comment on this entry


Posted by Don Ohsman, Publisher     1 Comments Monday, April 05, 2010
Title: The Diet

 

I cannot think of anyone I know who is not aware of how much they weigh now, weighed in the past, or want to weigh in the future.

There are very few people that I know of who are satisfied with the body they now have. Most of my contemporaries think they are too fat, in one case or two, too thin. Clothing retailers offer all sorts of options to make us look like the imagines we see in magazines or movies. We never do, but we hope/feel it gets us closer to what our vanity dictates.

Dieting programs/techniques/advice are billion dollar businesses in the US alone and no doubt elsewhere in the world as well. It’s a thriving booming industry and has been for decades.

So what to do about it? 

I’m far from being an expert, having gained about 30 pounds over the past 30 years.

I do know that as we age, our metabolism naturally slows down and if we don’t eat less, then we gain weight/fat and all the bad things that go along with it.

I’ve found that when you cut through all the hyperbole that the diet programs/foods try to sell, that they key is to consume fewer calories. Of course it helps to burn more calories as well and that’s really only accomplished by some form of exercise.

About 15 years ago, I read a book called The Zone by Barry Sears, PhD.

I found it to be fascinating and I recommend it to anyone who has interest in their physical being and lifestyle.

The message is quite simple:

1) The fewer calories you consume, compared to what you eat, dictate your weight

2) For most, consuming less food (calories) creates hunger. However, by eating a balanced diet of approximately 40% protein, 40% carbohydrates and 10% fat, our hunger is moderated to an extent that we eat fewer calories. We then lose weight.

3) The Zone name comes from feeling physically and mentally energized by eating properly.

One of Sears’s salient points is that consuming more than 40 or even 50% carbohydrates at any meal, makes us operate below our peak performance. It also goes to waist, hips, thighs, etc. Ever have a lunch of pasta and delicious garlic bread and maybe a glass of wine or two, and then find yourself fighting to stay awake an hour or two later? This is an extreme of what he’s talking about.

4) On this diet, you can eat the foods you like as long as you maintain the approximate 40/40/10 proportion. You’ll find yourself becoming full on eating considerably less and feeling better, in fact, feeling great afterwards.

I’m not writing this to sell this 15+-year-old book.

I am writing this to highly recommend that everyone who does not think they are operating at their peak efficiency, or who has problems with diabetes, their heart, cholesterol, or who just doesn’t feel or look as good as they feel they should all the time, will be well rewarded by following his council.

Sears says, “The most potent drugs we can take are what we eat.” He’s right.

As stated above, I’m about 30 lbs heavier than I was in my 40’s. So what has the Zone done for me?

To begin with, about 13 years ago I discovered the book and followed it to a T. I did everything it said. I consistently felt the best I probably ever had. As this diet said followers would, I lost about 1 lb./week for 3 months. At one point, I became concerned that there was something wrong with me and I was losing too much weight.

I fixed that! Cheating a little here, a little there, and before I knew it, the 12 lbs I’d lost soon became 10 then 8 and so on back up. I forgot how great I felt when I followed his advice.

So here I am, beginning my 7th decade of life about 15 lbs or so over weight.

When I’m a good boy and eat a meal of 40/40/10 I feel great without hunger. But all too often, I’m tempted by the snack sitting around the house or the wine and the desert in a nice restaurant (can’t have both when eating a normal size portion of protein,) or yielding to the delicious bread put on the table when I sit down at the table.

As the Lords Prayer says in part, (and that guy knew of which the was talking) “lead us not unto temptation.” Well, the author never heard of the Zone diet, or better to say lifestyle, but whoever wrote that prayer knew that humans, to varying degree’s, are too often short on will power.

I’ve also learned from the book that eating certain foods at certain times of the day are a habit. Our taste preferences are a habit as well. Too often we eat without thinking about what we are putting in our mouths.

I’m going to renew my efforts to get back In the Zone and see if my will can over come the power of temptation!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comment on this entry





Blog Menu

ARCHIVES





“your eyes on the market”


FREE Trial |  Subscribe Now |  Sample Reports |  Our Writers |  Testimonials |  About Us |  Contact Us

Site produced by www.hidenet.com
All information listed on every Hidenet report and on our website at www.hidenet.com are copyrighted
by Hidenet Publications. No information contained in the aforementioned sources may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically, without permission from the publisher in writing.