As soon as it was announced that Arizona’s governor
had
signed a new immigration law, two of my most liberal friends fired off
emails
to me saying how horrible it is.
Racial profiling was the immediate reaction.
Stopping people
on the street to check their papers, smacked of Nazism to many.
Some of the media are now talking how a number of
organizations are changing their plans to hold meetings in Arizona
because of
this terrible law.
The law gives local police broad authority to stop
and
request documents from anyone they reasonably suspect is an illegal
immigrant.
It calls for aggressive prosecution of illegal immigrants, and officers
can be
sued if they do not enforce the law.
One of our state senators, John McCain says it’s a
very good
law as Arizona is being overwhelmed with Mexican drugs along with hoards
of
illegal immigrants slipping through the states, beef up, but still
porous
border protection efforts.
I have heard estimates that about 10% of the
population are illegal, most of who are Hispanic/Mexican.
As always, there are a number of pro’s and con’s to
everything.
Police in Arizona are not about to take the time
they don’t
have to stop people on the street, namely Hispanics and almost always
Mexicans
to ask for proof of citizenship such as a driver’s license (that’s
another
story!)
As is the case everyplace else, they have their
hands full
in this time of budget cuts, just trying to protect the public from
crime that
goes on day in and day out.
Illegal immigrants take advantage of many services
that
costs the state money. Money that could be saved to go towards reducing
the
deficit.
It just so happens that a sizable percentage of
this crime
is committed by illegal immigrants and in the past, police could only
turn the
illegal’s they captured over to the immigration and naturalization
service that
could not cope with more people to process and often let them go.
What nobody talks about however is the value of the
illegal
immigrants to our society.
To look at it pragmatically, illegal immigrants
work cheaper
than anyone else, and typically work are hard works. Many eventually
become
legal by various means and are proud of it.
If all of these illegals are sent home, and that’s a
practical impossibility, who would replace the work they do for the
wages they
accept?
Nobody, which would mean that wages for the kind of
labor,
they perform day in and day out would rise considerably as would the
cost of
living in the areas that they left.
Additionally, the billions and billions of dollars
they send
back to their families every monthly/year would vanish. This would
severely
impact millions of the poorest families in Mexico and put more strain on
their
already troubled economy and political situation (drugs specifically)
At one point during the Bush administration, a plan
was
proffered calling for amnesty for illegal’s if they would register and
have a
crime free record after five years. They would then be required to pass a
citizenship test, like all other legal immigrants, and follow the tens
of
millions before them into becoming Americans.
This idea or something similar makes good sense to
me, but
alas, it has not come to pass.
At this stage, the law will be tested and
challenged in
Arizona and elsewhere as to whether it’s legal or not to racially
profile
someone, and who knows what the final outcome will be.
I might add that Israelis use racial profiling in
the
airports and other public places and have had remarkably good results. I
believe it’s even being tried in some airports here now as well.
If you’re in law enforcement, you know the type of
person
who typically commits a crime. If you’re a salesman, you instinctively
know
from experience if the person in front of you is going to buy or not. It
comes
with the territory
Therefore, whatever other aspects of the law are
good or
bad, Arizona does have a growing and seemingly insurmountable problem of
a
flood of illegal’s and drugs seeping across our long and penetrable
border with
Mexico.
Law enforcement authorities are not about to spend
their
time checking people who look Hispanic no more than they are going to
raid
every business that they suspect are hiring illegals. Under this law
they can,
but they don’t have the wherewithal to do so.
By the by, did anyone complain when federal
authorities
obtained the right, and did raid factories that they knew hired
illegal’s years
ago?
Did anyone threaten to sue when the federal
government made
it mandatory for employers to certify applicants for jobs had the proper
documentation to prove their legal status or face severe fines?
This Federal law has been in effect now for years
and by
hook or crook, employers are finding enough low priced immigrant labor
and
somehow comply with the federal law requiring proof of citizenship. The same thing is more than likely to evolve in
Arizona as
well.
The wonderful Mexican landscaper who comes
weekly to
take care of our yard with a crew of 3 or 4 non-English speakers hasn’t
been
seen since the law passed.
P.S.
An outspoken friend of mine sent me this email the other day:
"Being
a long time resident of Arizona I find
it amazing that the Governor signed a law that reflects the Federal law
already
in effect. For those morons who want to boycott Arizona, why not ask
your state
government which is the ONLY state to vote on and pass the MLK Holiday.
Oh my
it's that racist state Arizona.
If
you don't want to visit our beautiful
state, so be it. If you do and you do not do anything unlawful I don't
think
you will ever be stopped because of the color of your skin. I left
Tombstone
Arizona yesterday and lo and behold I had to stop at a Border Patrol
station,
and I'm as white as you can get (actually mostly grey by now).
So give us a break. Maybe more
states will wake up and pass a like
lawful law and stop the illegal aliens problem once and for all."
I would presume that most if not all readers have been in
both business and social situations and wondered when would be the best time to
leave.
By this I mean if you’re out for a meal with another person
or couple, when is it appropriate to say it’s time to go?
When is it right to use body language or put into the
conversation that it’s time to end the evening, or lunch or whatever?
Did you ever notice that in a group social situation when
someone starts to leave, everyone follows?
Were they waiting for an excuse to leave? Did they not want
to be at the event without those that were leaving? Was it an excuse for a
grateful exit?
Haven’t you ever hear the host saying; “I never thought
they’d leave?”
Most people use polite excuses when they’re ready to go.
This includes looking at your watch and saying “gee, I didn’t realize it was
getting so late”, or, Oh, I have an appointment” or a plane or train to catch”,
or “I better go now and beat the traffic” and on and on.
How about at a cocktail party or an industry related social
event?
You’re in a room full of people, many of whom you wish to
talk to, but you’re stuck in a corner with one person. How to extract yourself
and not let the person you’re talking to know that you’d rather be elsewhere?
The most challenging is when you are at someone’s house and
there’s no set meal to finish or event to conclude.
Last night we were invited over to a friend’s house for
cocktails, or a drink and snacks. They are very nice people and this is the
first time we have done anything socially.
They had an array of cheeses and cold cuts etc and served
some terrific wine (x Cosco- Cameron Hughes lot 137 Syrah Paso Robles). It was
perfect with what we ate and we enjoyed ourselves.
The conversation flowed smoothly but at some point, I wondered
when it would be appropriate to leave.
My wife and I certainly did not want to over-stay our
welcome, and I was not wearing a watch so I couldn’t tell how long we’d been
there.
I didn’t have a clue either as to how long they expected us
to stay? 30 minutes? 1 hr? 3 hrs? How do you know?
I tried to observe their body language or read them somehow,
but I could not. I couldn’t communicate with my wife either. Haven’t you ever been to a party or a
dinner and you had to send signals to your companion that you wanted to leave?
No chance to do that here, so what to do?
Again, no clue as to how long we’d been there, but I had
eaten my full, my wife did not seem as enthusiastically conversational as she had
been at first, nor did they, so I figured it was time to make our move.
We got up, gave our sincere thanks, they didn’t protest
(guess we were there long enough as far as they were concerned) and off we
went.
Did we leave to soon? Stay to long? Were they pleased with
the length of our visit? We’ll never know.
Some call it couples dating. They did say that we should get
together for dinner sometime, so I guess we were somewhat of a hit!
Don’t you always wonder what they say about you after you
leave? We’ll never know….
A colleague of sorts in the leather trade recently wrote an article after attending the Hong Kong Leather Fair. It is a message similar to a previous blog I wrote about the importance of "pressing the flesh" or personal meetings to furhter business, or for that matter, any relation ship.
Traveling back from Hong Kong
after an immensely successful and satisfying APLF I picked up the latest
edition of Business Week. What caught my attention was the front cover
illustrating the Chinese flag behind a chain link fence emblazoned with
the headline “The New Protectionism”.
The lead article was an
interesting read despite the blatantly anti-Chinese angle which
discredited the article itself. Nevertheless, what caught my eye was a
full page advertisement for British Airways with the headline:
“Experience what we know. Business is done better face-to-face”.
Face-to-Face
negotiations at APLF 2010
With the advent
of electronic conferencing, email, instant chat and free-of-charge Skype
this claim could be debatable in today’s world. But apparently not so
in terms of the fashion industry. According to International Herald
Tribune fashion writer, Suzy Menkes, this world is now permeated by a
combination of materials and leather almost reminiscent of the Swinging
Sixties in London.
The question is how can you appreciate the
tone, texture, smell and “je ne sais quoi” of leather when a potential
designer and/or supplier sends you a .jpg file to your email or Skype
account, hoping you will order 500 units?
Besides being a
“people business” the leather industry is not really an industry where
electronic sales will eventually dominate. Sure, there are all sorts of
statistics floating around proving that the Y generation will purchase
footwear via the internet. But what serious buyer in his right mind will
buy 500 bags designed by Jean Paul Gaultier from a.jpg image or .pdf
design sketch? Please name one!
Leather demands more than bytes.
It demands “see me, feel me, touch me, and smell me”. There can be no
other option. Only people with a lack of knowledge would consider buying
leather mainly on price rather than on the quality. Leather has to be
“experienced” and even more so with a whole palette of colors available
which would lose their impact in a .gif or .jpg file.
British
Airways needs seats filled on their jets. “Last year we took over 600
professionals to London and beyond – for free – so that they could
conduct business face-to-face”, boasts the Business Week advertisement.
All very commendable and one has to agree with BA that face-to-face is
more effective and more personal, especially for the 600 professionals
transported free-of-charge to London.
The key elements here are
“600”, “free” and “face-to-face”. Last week some 23,000 plus visitors
attended the world’s leading fashion and materials/leather event. They
met “face-to-face” and “free” with their suppliers at APLF in Hong Kong.
This is mandatory in any event where leather is combined with fashion.
You
just cannot sign a deal with any confidence unless it is face-to-face
where leather or fashion is involved. You just have to see the product
and APLF offers this opportunity “free” to many thousands of fashion
professionals. Perhaps this should be advertised as an even bigger
give-away by highlighting the “see me, feel me, touch me, and smell me”
requirements of top class leather design?
In the meantime, I’d
better get back to reading about “The New Protectionism” which we will
cover at a later date, since that was the initial reason I purchased
Business Week. But somehow, reminding ourselves about the face-to-face
concept seems to be much more important both for the leather fashion
industry…… as well as for British Airways….
Here’s a five minute
video from British Airways Face to Face campaign with a Boeing 747 aptly
named “Face to Face”. Listen to the introduction by the BA marketing
person and the comments from the participants. We could not have said it
any better. If you think that video conferencing, emails or phone calls
compares to this, then perhaps it might be worth reconsidering the
sales strategy!
I’ve tried to stay from my political views on these pages,
and I shall continue to do so. However, I must say that while I am opposed to
nearly all of Obama’s policies and see his VP Biden as a loose cannon, I am
very glad that McCain and Palin lost the last election.
I have just finished a fascinating book called Game Change.
If, like me, you stay abreast of current events and read the papers, you will
find this book hard to put down.
It takes the reader behind the scenes of how Presidential
candidates operate in the primaries and then for the primary winners, the
national election.
All of the candidates hire what they hope will be the best
and brightest to run their campaign. This ranges from travel arrangements,
finding and gathering crowds and locations to hear the candidates, managing the
press, raising money and a multitude of details to numerous to list here.
It also details the primary fight between Hillary Clinton
and Obama and the pitfalls that hurt her campaign and cost her the nomination.
The book shows that had she had the right people and managed them effectively,
she would more than likely have been the party’s nominee.
She didn’t do it
right and Obama did. The result had nothing to do with their qualifications to become
President.
I’ve always heard that Presidential candidates chose their
running mates based on their ability to get votes. Reading Game Change, I can
see that there is little if any thought as to how competent the Vice
Presidential candidate might be if the President dies or becomes incapacitated.
They’re chosen strictly for their vote getting ability. If they have other
skills, that’s a plus but is typically secondary.
The whole process is packaging, or imaging. I’m sure Proctor
and Gamble uses similar criteria in selling their soap. Make the product look
like what the public wants and it will sell. So will a candidate. “Tell em what
they want to hear!”
It’s ludicrous that the potential leader of the free world
is chosen in this way.
I always have said that any president is only as good as the
people around him. Just like the top person of any organization is only as good
as those around him.
The Presidential candidate who can muster and manage and
raise enough money wins the primary and then the national election. This does
not necessarily make him the best President by any means, but his ability to
win certainly says something for his management skills, a very important facet
of being President.
So why am I, a conservative, very pleased that Obama won?
Because this book, which was, in my opinion, not prejudicial
for either party or candidate, showed how inept a leader of his campaign McCain
was compared to Obama.
Most of all, it shows how inept it was for McCain to pick
Palin at the last minute without going through the normal vetting process. This
resulted in fielding a running make amazingly ignorant of the world around her
as well as its history.
The book showed that she’s far from dumb and has since
educated herself and we haven’t heard the last of her.
The point is, no business would hire its leaders and top
managers the way we elect our politicians. No business would likely employ a
majority of members of congress and in the executive branch based on the way
too many of them perform.
In large part, it’s the system. From day one, not only here but
also in most if not all other countries, money and influence talks.
Candidates have no chance to get enough votes to win without
financing. In almost all, if not all cases of significant donors, those who contribute
expect something in return, either directly or indirectly.
In my view, the only way to overcome this is what is known
as public financing.
Give each candidate x dollars and prohibit funding from any
other source, including the candidate himself. Will we ever see it, I doubt it.
As I was leaving home yesterday morning, I saw a fire truck
and an ambulence parked in front of my neighbor’s house. I stopped to inquiry.
The paramedic said they were not allowed by federal law to tell me what
happened, but, in so many words, he let me that there was a death in side.
I knew immediately that it was my friend. He was in his
early 70’s, had diabetes for many years and was so over-weight, he couldn’t
walk very far.
Although he was obviously not in good health, he was tenacious
in his pursuit of things that interested him, one of which happened to be our
Home Owners Association. He had a
lively personality, a sharp mind and excellent common sense. I know this
because we served on several boards together and for the last two years, I had
worked very closely with him and a few others on matters concerning our
HOA. We had a meeting at his house
just the other night, but looking back, he didn’t quite seem himself.
Even though by looking at him, you could guess his longevity
would not be long, it was still a shock to sit down for a few hours in a
meeting with him, and then less tan 48 hrs later, boom, he’s gone.
My father died this way when I was in my early teens. We had
dinner; he watched some television, (and if I remember right, It was I love
Lucy, and did he love that show and laughed and laughed at her antics). Then he
went to bed, had a heart attack, and boom he was gone.
We all know situations like this. It could be an automobile
accident, or in war, when it’s almost commonplace. Boom, a living breathing
soul with all of the hopes, disappointments and joys and problems we all live
with each day, and their lives are over in an instant.
As I said to his widow, I truly believe that after here, we
all go to a better place, but of course nobody knows for sure. I also said that
we all die sooner or later, and quickly is the best. I doubt if I was any
comfort as she naturally was distraught.
So what’s the lesson; To never forget that every life is fragile
and at the same time precious. To never take anything for granted and to live
fully in every moment that we can. Savor the time we have with those dear one’s
who we don’t see very often, and even those that we do.
I always remember my grandmother crying every time she’d
leave us and go back to her home 700 or so miles away. We only got to see her
several times a year. As a boy, I wondered why she would cry? We always had
such a good time when we were together.
Now, 60 or so years later, as I am approximately her age
when she would leave and cry, I now know why. She realized the fragility of
life and wondered if she’d ever see us again.
From a totally different aspect, let’s look at how we spend
our cherished days on earth.
Do we scrimp and save and put off doing the things that bring
us pleasure until tomorrow when “we’ll have more time” or “things will be
better”, or next year we’ll do this, or next month or tomorrow?
What if we lose our job or source of income? What if we run
out of money before we die?
Thirty or forty years ago, my uncle married his (my cousin.)
They were a widower and a widow and had grown up together. They were in their
late sixties or early seventies. They had a big wedding, half a continent away
from us, and all of the family gathered. We of course were invited but I said
to my wife that I didn’t want to take the time off from work, and spend the
money to go.
What a mistake. Half the people there were aged and died
soon after, and those who went cherished the time they had together.
From then on, my wife and I decided that we would do everything
we could to make any family event and those of good friends, and we did. We
never regretted it, and I often come across pictures of those good times and
enjoy the fond memories. (the only downside is to see how young I once looked!)
I said to my new bride that one of the reasons that we
should have a significant wedding celebration last month was to gather all of
the friends and relatives we could afford, and who could come to share in the
joy of our wonderful union and birthday. We were so fortunate to find love
again in our lives.
Yes, we all have to have some financial preparedness for the
future, and for emergencies and the unknown. But let us not forget to live,
love and appreciate our life while we’re still healthy enough to do so.
Most people generally think there are better places
to eat
than at chain food restaurants, but all will agree, there are some
exceptions.
Cheesecake factory comes to mind.
Also as the national chains become more dominant
the small
operators can’t compete. This leaves fewer options for “home cooked”
food.
This past week, our grandchildren were visiting,
and we had
the opportunity to visit some of the better one’s.
A long time favorite, and one I would highly
recommend is
Famous Dave’s. They’re all over the country and in my humble opinion,
have the
best barbeque, (aside of Wharton Texas), that I’ve ever eaten!
The price is reasonable for what you
get, the service can’t be beat and there’s a wide range of entrée’s to
choose
from. Don’s grade for this barbeque restaurant: A
Another national chain that I’ve only eaten once or
twice in
Las Vegas is the Rain Forest Café. Talk about “shtick” this one is
loaded with
it.
Thunder, lightening, elephants and lions roaring,
etc. Kids love it. The
menu is broad, the prices are relatively reasonable, and to my surprise,
the
food was quite good. Delicious no, but for what it was, I would
recommend it,
especially with small children. Don’s grade: B
Also this past month, I happened to eat at one of
my local
Phoenix favorites called Chelsea’s Kitchen. I like it so much I went
there for
my birthday to savor their short ribs of beef. The waiter recommended a
wine
that I’d like to pass on.
It’s called Lang & Reed Cabernet Franc. I had
the 2007
at the restaurant and bought several bottles to have at home. It sells
in the
store, if you can find it, for about $13.00-$15.00. It’s dry, but not
heavy and
is flavorful. Goes well with the aforementioned beef short ribs, steak
and pork
tenderloin that I enjoyed tonight.
During our wedding last month, we had to have some
sacramental wine for the ceremony. It’s just a few sips from a shared
goblet.
The Rabbi cautioned us to get a white wine as it can spill sometimes and
red
wine would ruin the brides dress. He also asked that we buy kosher wine.
Off I went and found a bottle for of Recanati
Israeli Chardonnay.
It’s a 2006 medium bodied, fresh testing semi dry to dry white wine. It
cost
$15.99.
It was so good, my bride and I had more than a few
sips
(more like gulps!) during the ceremony. I brought the rest of it into
the
reception to share with some friends. I have since bought a few more
bottles,
had it with turkey the other night and highly recommend it.
By the way, if you drink wine at home and have a
partial
bottle left over that you’d like to keep for a week or ten days, there
is a device
that comes with a rubber cork, that you put in the opened bottle. You
then pump
this thing over the rubber cork and it takes the air out.It’s fast and simple and the wine keeps
well in the refrigerator for a limited amount of time. Most wine stores
have it.
Speaking of wine, I received an unsolicited email
today from
Zagat, the respected restaurant guide in North America. They were
hawking 12
bottles of recommended wine for $69.99 plus another $20.00 for shipping.
This
comes to $7.50 a bottle, so I thought I’d try the variety of Red wine’s
they
offer.A good deal?
I cannot think of anyone I know who is not aware of how much
they weigh now, weighed in the past, or want to weigh in the future.
There are very few people that I know of who are satisfied
with the body they now have. Most of my contemporaries think they are too fat,
in one case or two, too thin. Clothing retailers offer all sorts of options to
make us look like the imagines we see in magazines or movies. We never do, but
we hope/feel it gets us closer to what our vanity dictates.
Dieting programs/techniques/advice are billion dollar
businesses in the US alone and no doubt elsewhere in the world as well. It’s a
thriving booming industry and has been for decades.
So what to do about it?
I’m far from being an expert, having gained about 30 pounds
over the past 30 years.
I do know that as we age, our metabolism naturally slows
down and if we don’t eat less, then we gain weight/fat and all the bad things
that go along with it.
I’ve found that when you cut through all the hyperbole that
the diet programs/foods try to sell, that they key is to consume fewer calories.
Of course it helps to burn more calories as well and that’s really only
accomplished by some form of exercise.
About 15 years ago, I read a book called The Zone by Barry
Sears, PhD.
I found it to be fascinating and I recommend it to anyone
who has interest in their physical being and lifestyle.
The message is quite simple:
1) The fewer calories you consume, compared to what you eat,
dictate your weight
2) For most, consuming less food (calories) creates hunger. However,
by eating a balanced diet of approximately 40% protein, 40% carbohydrates and
10% fat, our hunger is moderated to an extent that we eat fewer calories. We
then lose weight.
3) The Zone name comes from feeling physically and mentally
energized by eating properly.
One of Sears’s salient points is that consuming more than 40
or even 50% carbohydrates at any meal, makes us operate below our peak
performance. It also goes to waist, hips, thighs, etc. Ever have a lunch of
pasta and delicious garlic bread and maybe a glass of wine or two, and then find
yourself fighting to stay awake an hour or two later? This is an extreme of
what he’s talking about.
4) On this diet, you can eat the foods you like as long as
you maintain the approximate 40/40/10 proportion. You’ll find yourself becoming
full on eating considerably less and feeling better, in fact, feeling great
afterwards.
I’m not writing this to sell this 15+-year-old book.
I am writing this to highly recommend that everyone who does
not think they are operating at their peak efficiency, or who has problems with
diabetes, their heart, cholesterol, or who just doesn’t feel or look as good as
they feel they should all the time, will be well rewarded by following his
council.
Sears says, “The most potent drugs we can take are what we
eat.” He’s right.
As stated above, I’m about 30 lbs heavier than I was in my
40’s. So what has the Zone done for me?
To begin with, about 13 years ago I discovered the book and
followed it to a T. I did everything it said. I consistently felt the best I
probably ever had. As this diet said followers would, I lost about 1 lb./week
for 3 months. At one point, I became concerned that there was something wrong
with me and I was losing too much weight.
I fixed that! Cheating a little here, a little there, and
before I knew it, the 12 lbs I’d lost soon became 10 then 8 and so on back up.
I forgot how great I felt when I followed his advice.
So here I am, beginning my 7th decade of life
about 15 lbs or so over weight.
When I’m a good boy and eat a meal of 40/40/10 I feel great
without hunger. But all too often, I’m tempted by the snack sitting around the
house or the wine and the desert in a nice restaurant (can’t have both when
eating a normal size portion of protein,) or yielding to the delicious bread
put on the table when I sit down at the table.
As the Lords Prayer says in part, (and that guy knew of
which the was talking) “lead us not unto temptation.” Well, the author never
heard of the Zone diet, or better to say lifestyle, but whoever wrote that
prayer knew that humans, to varying degree’s, are too often short on will
power.
I’ve also learned from the book that eating certain foods at
certain times of the day are a habit. Our taste preferences are a habit as
well. Too often we eat without thinking about what we are putting in our
mouths.
I’m going to renew my efforts to get back In the Zone and
see if my will can over come the power of temptation!
Site produced by www.hidenet.com
All information listed on every Hidenet report and on our website at www.hidenet.com are copyrighted
by Hidenet Publications. No information contained in the aforementioned sources may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically, without permission from the publisher in writing.